Plastic, Mount Rushmore and the Korean DMZ


I was reading an interesting chapter from “The World Without Us” by Alan Weisman last night. The book is based on a thought experiment examining how man-made infrastructure (e.g. cities, dams, petrochemical refineries) and ecological impacts and interventions (e.g. modern agriculture, plastic pollution and nature preserves) would hold-up if humans were taken out of the equation (aliens abduct us or the rapture comes down and we’ve all been really good).

One of the key takeaways from the book is that most things don’t get beyond 10 or 20 years before degrading significantly, often collapsing and subsequently being colonized by various forms of life (bacteria do the dirtiest work, eventually evolving to eat things like petrochemicals). Some of our seemingly most invincible industrial sites are some of the most fragile.

The things that will be around the longest? Plastic and Mount Rushmore. The chapter on plastic has inspired our household to forgo as much plastic as possible in our daily lives (more on that effort in another post). Plastic does not biodegrade – literally every scrap that has ever been produced in history lives-on somewhere in some form, either as buried plastic bags in landfills or as tiny particles of plastic bobbing in the ocean, working their way up the food chain. It’s a legacy that suddenly makes a plastic wrapped sandwich or plastic take-out fork look a lot less appealing. As for Mount Rushmore, the ancient granite carved with the faces of presidents erodes one inch every 10,000 years, which means remnants of the sculpture should be around for seven million years or so.

The subject of the chapter I was reading was the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) between North and South Korea. The zone is 250km long and 4km wide. In addition to being closely guarded on both sides by hundreds of thousands of soldiers armed to the teeth, the area is strewn with landmines, ironically making it one the safest and most “natural” places in Asia for endangered species like the red-crowned crane (pictured above). One third of the remaining 2500 cranes depend on the DMZ and nearby Civilian Controlled Zone (CCZ) as their only sanctuary on the Korean peninsula. Because the zone has been free of human intervention since the early 1950′s, it’s in a relatively pristine state, with some hoping that a few of the world’s all-but-extinct Siberian tigers might still call it home. Like other nature preserves, Weisman sees the DMZ as an ark of sorts, a place where if conditions were right, biological diversity would spring forth and begin colonizing the rest of the peninsula if human influence was removed or reduced.

Despite the landmines and more than a half-century of hatred and military incidents on both sides, many think that Korea will one day be reunited and that the DMZ could be up for grabs, easing housing pressure in cities like Seoul and making real-estate developers’ dreams come true. Others think the DMZ should be left as is (with some of the landmines removed) and transformed into a peace and nature park – a legacy salvaged from the bitter Cold War battle of a nation divided against itself.

The DMZ provides an interesting example of inadvertent human preservation of natural ecosystems that are rapidly disappearing in otherwise “peaceful” parts of the world (it should be noted however that the DMZ is still too small to support genetically healthy wildlife populations over the long-term).

Alberta’s latest oil sands conservation plan violates First Nations’ treaty rights – Gets failing grade from ecology experts.

Almost no First Nations input or ecological analysis has been included in the latest draft of the Lower Athabasca Regional Plan (LARP). “This attempt (the draft plan) is not even worthy of a passing grade in a university course,” said Dr. David Schindler, a world-renowned ecology professor at the University of Alberta.

“Aboriginal groups say a government plan that will dictate the future of Alberta’s oilsands region heavily favours industrial development over environmental preservation, and they are prepared to sue if that doesn’t change.”

First Nations pan Athabasca land-use plan
CBC News Edmonton
June 7, 2011
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2011/06/07/edmonton-lower-athabasca-plan.html

Crisis looming over lack of plan for conservation, aboriginal groups say

Karen Kleiss
Edmonton Journal
June 7, 2011
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/technology/Crisis+looming+over+lack+plan+conservation+aboriginal+groups/4904066/story.html

Chiefs threaten legal action over Athabasca plan – Consultation process flawed: First Nations
Darcy Henton
Calgary Herald
June 7, 2011
http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/Chiefs+threaten+legal+action+over+Athabasca+plan/4903915/story.html

First Nations ready to fight LARP in court
Carol Christian
Fort McMurray Today
June 7, 2011
http://www.fortmcmurraytoday.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3159027

Aboriginal groups threaten legal action
Edmonton iNews880.com
June 7, 2011
http://www.inews880.com/Channels/Reg/LocalNews/story.aspx?ID=1436893

Legal threats undermine hoped-for peace on oilsands land use as comment closes

Bob Weber
The Canadian Press
June 6, 2011
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/life/greenpage/123255843.html

Chiefs tell Alberta Government: “Fix Lower Athabasca Regional Plan”


EDMONTON, ALBERTA–(Marketwire – June 6, 2011) -
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation and Mikisew Cree First Nation –

Violations of Rights Creates Risk for Oil Sands Development

Chief Roxanne Marcel of the Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN) and Chief Allan Adam of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nations (ACFN) met with Alberta Government Ministers today, and told them they need to fix the draft Lower Athabasca Regional Plan.

The Alberta Government has been under criticism over oil sands development in the Lower Athabasca region. Since 2005, both ACFN and MCFN have made numerous submissions on how to improve land use planning where it affects their traditional territory. They have consistently put forward recommendations for policies and protected areas while offering to work with Government to undertake traditional resource use planning that would help set meaningful safeguards and thresholds for ecological disturbance such as for land, air and water – and help ensure Treaty and Aboriginal rights are protected for current and future generations. Unfortunately, the input of the First Nations has been ignored time and time again.

A legal analysis that addresses LARP will be published in June by the Canadian Institute of Resources Law (CIRL) at the University of Calgary. Monique Passelac-Ross, co-author, said “Protection of aboriginal land uses or treaty rights is not included in any of the outcomes, objectives, strategies or management framework of the draft LARP. It reflects almost none of the input provided by the affected First Nations.”

“There is no legal impediment to the Government of Alberta to involving First Nations more meaningfully in land use planning,” said Bob Freedman, legal counsel to the First Nations. “They just don’t seem to be willing to do so.”

“LARP is a smoke screen to make it seem like the Alberta government has a plan to protect the region. The reality is that LARP will allow for massive expansion of oil sands development that already violates our rights, and is causing environmental and health problems,” said Chief Marcel. “Alberta cannot afford to have this Government push through a land use plan that prioritizes the interests of one industry and essentially ignores the health and sustainability of local ecosystems and cultures.”

Even some oil companies recognize the need for the Alberta Government to do to more to uphold and honour its constitutional obligations. Leo Piciacchia, Vice President of Total E&P Canada – a major oil sands firm – said, “Total supports the First Nations’ request for more thorough consultation on the draft LARP that considers the rights of the First Nations.”

Of particular concern to MCFN and ACFN is the fact that under LARP, the development of key frameworks, like the biodiversity plan and the land disturbance plan, are not required to be developed until 2013, after far more oil sands and other development is approved. As Chief Marcel noted, “This is putting the cart before the horse and it is clear that Alberta is planning for a huge increase in oil sands development without taking our constitutional rights into consideration.”

Violating First Nation rights can open oil sands development to litigation risk, corporate reputation risk, market risk and other investor risks. “We have come to say enough is enough,” Chief Adam said. “We have constitutionally protected rights under Treaty 8. If the Alberta government doesn’t do what is needed to protect our land, air and water and our rights, then we will oppose further industrial development in the region, and oppose
the draft LARP using every legal avenue available to us.”

Contact:

Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Chief Allan Adam
780-713-1220

Mikisew Cree First Nation
Chief Roxanne Marcel
780-881-7099

Canadian Institute of Resource Law
Monique Passelac-Ross
403-220-3973

Legal Counsel to ACFN and MCFN
Bob Freedman
250-818-3719

Media Advisory: First Nation Chiefs Confront Alberta Government on Lower Athabasca Regional Plan

Chiefs to hold press conference with Dr. David Schindler, water scientist.

EDMONTON, ALBERTA–(Marketwire – June 3, 2011) - Chief Roxanne Marcel of the Mikisew Cree First Nation and Chief Allan Adam of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation will meet with Alberta Government Ministers, and then host a press conference in Edmonton.

With concerns over tar sands development and environmental and health problems in the area, the Government of Alberta is under an international spotlight to address the problems. Violations of Constitutionally-protected Treaty rights pose a serious concern that can result in litigation, intervention from the Federal government, and investor insecurity.

Pointing out Treaty and Constitutional rights, the Chiefs have repeatedly communicated concerns with earlier versions of the draft Lower Athabasca Regional Plan (LARP), while putting forward constructive solutions on how to move forward. June 6, 2011 is the closing day for public consultation on the draft LARP.

Local community members and Elders will be joined by Dr. David Schindler, water scientist.

Who: Chief Allan Adam – Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Chief Roxanne Marcel – Mikisew Cree First Nation
Dr. David Schindler – water scientist
What: Press Conference regarding the Lower Athabasca Land Use Plan, and the Chiefs’ meeting with Government. Coffee and tea will be served.
When: Monday June 6, 2011 at 3:00pm
Where:

Contact:

Prism Room – Matrix Hotel (10640 100 Avenue NW Edmonton)

David Thompson 780-910-4161

The Oil Sands’ Strange Bedfellows: Chinese Capitalists and Albertan Communists

Has anyone noticed the irony in the latest line of pro-pipeline rhetoric from oil sands boosters in Alberta?

Apparently China is willing to invest between $10 and $20 billion dollars in the oil sands, but only if Canada fast-tracks construction of the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline and tanker project (regulatory due process be damned, and forget the fact that 80% of British Columbians are against oil tanker traffic off the north coast of B.C.).

Forcing resource projects against the will of citizens is business as usual in China, but it’s ironic to hear Alberta’s oil sands boosters arguing for the same practices here in Canada (as reported earlier this week by Chris Varcoe at the Calgary Herald):

Ian Wild, executive vice-president of ATB Corporate Financial Services, said he heard from Beijing oil executives this week that they are growing frustrated by delays in Canadian pipeline development and future investment is clearly at risk.

“I know they’re saying to me that their patience has run out,” he said. “They told me specifically that there’s at least $10 to $20 billion in jeopardy here for the province.”

God forbid the Chinese run out of patience with our more democratic (though still leaving much to be desired) process for review of proposed pipelines, or the legal precedents that require governments to consult with individual First Nations along the proposed pipeline route. Things would be so much easier if the oil sands were in Tibet.

One of the more disconcerting elements of the reports coming out of Alberta’s recent trade mission to China is the way boosters seem to marvel at Beijing’s insatiable appetite for oil sands crude (at a time when the world’s greenhouse gas emissions have never been higher, pushing us closer towards runaway climate change):

As for promises that larger investments are coming, Schulz [Professor in the Haskayne School of Business at the University of Calgary] said no one should be shocked given the scale of recent moves.

“The amount of money is not a surprise,” said the director of petroleum land management with the university. “This is just an incremental bite and they’re ready for the next one. And each bite will be bigger.”